QRメニューアプリ徹底比較：MenuTiger、GloriaFood、Square ほか（2026年版）

If you are comparing QR code menu tools, you have probably already seen names like MenuTiger, GloriaFood, Square, and Toast in the same breath. They are not interchangeable. Some are built around table ordering and payments; others are POS modules; others are menu-first platforms with lighter operations.

We publish this guide from Menu Lyns, so take that bias as given. We still tried to write it the way we would want to read it before signing a contract: what each option is actually good at, where it falls short, and who should look elsewhere. Listings are not sponsorships. Plans and prices below were checked in early 2026 and will drift—confirm on each company's site before you buy.

At a glance

GloriaFood

GloriaFood is often the first name operators hit when they want a free QR ordering setup. The pitch is straightforward: guests scan, browse, and order without you paying commission on those orders. For a single-location takeaway or casual dine-in spot testing digital ordering, that is genuinely attractive.

Honest strengths: Low barrier to start, familiar workflow for owners who care about order volume more than menu aesthetics. Many teams run it successfully for years.

Where it can disappoint:Branding and analytics are not why people choose it. If you care about polished visual identity, deep multilingual control, or rich engagement reporting, you may outgrow the free tier or end up stacking paid modules. Compare total cost once you need marketing or app extras—not just the headline "free."

Good fit if: You want scan-to-order fast and your menu changes are modest. Skip or compare further if: Your priority is brand-led menu experience across many languages and locations without bolting on extras.

MenuTiger

MenuTiger shows up in almost every "best QR menu" roundup—and for fair reasons. It combines digital menus, online ordering, QR codes, and reporting, with paid tiers that scale table counts and number of stores. Public pricing has ranged from a usable free/premium trial band into roughly $17–$119/month depending on tables and locations (verify current plans).

Honest strengths: Solid choice when you want menus and ordering in one package and you may grow to a handful of branches. Integrations (POS, automation tools) matter to operators who already think in systems, not just PDFs.

Where it can disappoint: Feature surface area means onboarding time. Smaller cafés that only need a beautiful menu guests can read—not pay through—may pay for complexity they never touch.

Good fit if: You expect ordering plus multi-location menu governance. Compare alternatives if: You mainly need guests to browse a branded menu in many languages and you want predictable subscription pricing without stacking operational modules you will not use.

Menu Lyns (us)

We will keep this section shorter than marketing would prefer. Menu Lyns is aimed at restaurants and cafés that want guests to scan a branded, multilingual menu and at operators who want engagement signal—what gets viewed, in which language—without adopting a new POS.

What we do well:

• Structured menus with categories, photos, tags, and fast edits from a dashboard
• Logo, colors, and header branding so the page feels like your venue
• Many menu languages, including RTL layouts where needed
• Multiple places or branches under one subscription
• QR codes that keep working when content changes—same code, updated menu
• Menu engagement analytics rather than only checkout totals
• Published pricing around $10/month, $54/six months, and $100/year with a trial period—no sales call to see the number

Good fit if: You want a modern digital QR menu instead of printing and reprinting paper menus, you need changes to go live quickly from a dashboard, you serve guests in more than one language, and you want analytics on scans and menu engagement—not just a static PDF on a table tent.

Menubly

Menubly positions itself as an affordable QR menu with ordering, often cited around $10/month entry points in comparison articles. It is a sensible shortlist name when budget is tight but you still want more than a static PDF link.

Honest strengths: Price-to-feature ratio for independents; commission-free ordering is part of the story operators care about.

Where it can disappoint: Less discussed in enterprise or heavy multi-brand scenarios. If you are a 15-location group with centralized brand police, validate admin workflows on a call—not from a blog table.

Good fit if: Single or few locations, ordering matters, monthly cost is the main filter. Look wider if: Analytics depth and language breadth drive your decision more than checkout flows.

Square and Toast

Square and Toast appear in QR menu searches because both offer digital ordering tied to POS. If you already run service on Square Terminal or Toast hardware, turning on their guest-facing menu can be the path of least resistance.

Honest strengths: One stack for payments, tickets, and increasingly kitchen flow. Less vendor fragmentation. For high-volume US venues already standardized on one of them, that matters.

Where it can disappoint: You are buying an ecosystem, not renting a menu. Switching costs are real. QR as a module may feel secondary—branding and menu analytics are rarely why people switch POS. Transaction fees and monthly software/hardware costs dominate the spreadsheet, not QR stickers.

Good fit if: POS is decided and QR is a checkbox. Look elsewhere if: You want a POS-agnostic menu layer you can change vendors without rebuilding guest-facing content.

Sunday

Sunday (often written "Sunday App") is known for pay-at-table and faster turns in full-service restaurants, especially in markets where card present behavior and tipping culture fit their model. Pricing is typically premium compared with menu-only SaaS.

Honest strengths: When the bottleneck is settling the check, not displaying appetizers, Sunday targets the right pain. Operators chasing table turnover metrics report meaningful wins.

Where it can disappoint: If you only need a multilingual lunch menu for a beach bar, you are shopping in the payments lane. Implementation and commercial terms reflect that.

Good fit if: Payment speed and table economics are the project. Not the first call if: You only need menu publishing and scan analytics.

me&u (formerly Mr Yum)

me&u built its reputation on visual, upsell-friendly menus in sit-down dining—photos, prompts, and experiences that nudge higher spend. You will see it in venues that treat the menu as a sales surface, not a compliance PDF.

Honest strengths: Guest UX polish in competitive full-service markets; strong when average check and attachment rate are KPIs leadership actually reviews.

Where it can disappoint: Commercial model and rollout are closer to enterprise hospitality tech than self-serve signup. A neighborhood bakery with two languages and weekly cake rotations does not need this weight class.

Good fit if: Upsell storytelling is strategic and budget matches. Overkill if: You need simple QR menus and straightforward monthly pricing tomorrow.

MustHaveMenus

MustHaveMenus comes from the print menu design world and extends into digital. Teams that still think in laminated trifolds sometimes prefer it because the design tooling feels familiar.

Honest strengths: Design templates, print ordering, and a path for operators who refresh physical menus seasonally.

Where it can disappoint: If you rarely print and live in daily digital updates, print-first workflows can feel backwards. Mobile-native analytics and scan behavior are not the core story.

Good fit if: Print and digital must stay twins. Less ideal if: You have not ordered physical menus in a year.

How we would shortlist in practice

1. Write down the job. Menu only? Menu + pay? Full POS? One wrong word here sends you to the wrong category.
2. Run a 30-minute pilot on two finalists. Build ten real items, scan on an old phone, switch language, hide a sold-out dish. Ugly UX shows up immediately.
3. Model year-one cost. Include POS fees, add-ons, and staff time—not just SaaS list price.
4. Ask who owns updates. If only one manager can publish, you will revert to paper when they are on holiday.

Bottom line

There is no universal winner—only a winner for your constraints. GloriaFood and Menubly earn their mentions on price and ordering; MenuTiger on breadth; Square and Toast on unified operations; Sunday on payments; me&u on premium upsell; MustHaveMenus when print still matters.

Run your own trial week. The right tool is the one your floor staff will actually keep updated after the launch dinner—not the one with the longest feature grid on a comparison blog (including this one).